Evidence
Same model and position · retrieved passages supplied · first output
In this survey, we bring together the datasets, architectures and evaluation techniques that define visually grounded spoken language modelling, and we organise them around the tasks they address and the modalities they exploit.
Passages supplied to the Evidence version
Card 1 · Textual Supervision for Visually Grounded Spoken Language Understanding
Visually-grounded models of spoken language understanding extract semantic information directly from speech, without relying on transcriptions.This is useful for low-resource languages, where transcriptions can be expensive or impossible to obtain.Recent work showed that these models can be improved…
Read full passage excerpt
Visually-grounded models of spoken language understanding extract semantic information directly from speech, without relying on transcriptions.This is useful for low-resource languages, where transcriptions can be expensive or impossible to obtain.Recent work showed that these models can be improved if transcriptions are available at training time.However, it is not clear how an end-to-end approach compares to a traditional pipeline-based approach when one has access to transcriptions.Comparing different strategies, we find that the pipeline approach works better when enough text is available.With low-resource languages in mind, we also show that translations can be effectively used in place of transcriptions but more data is needed to obtain similar results.
Card 2 · Analyzing Utility of Visual Context in Multimodal Speech Recognition Under Noisy Conditions
Multimodal learning allows us to leverage information from multiple sources (visual, acoustic and text), similar to our experience of the real world. However, it is currently unclear to what extent auxiliary modalities improve performance over unimodal models, and under what circumstances the auxili…
Read full passage excerpt
Multimodal learning allows us to leverage information from multiple sources (visual, acoustic and text), similar to our experience of the real world. However, it is currently unclear to what extent auxiliary modalities improve performance over unimodal models, and under what circumstances the auxiliary modalities are useful. We examine the utility of the auxiliary visual context in Multimodal Automatic Speech Recognition in adversarial settings, where we deprive the models from partial audio signal during inference time. Our experiments show that while MMASR models show significant gains over traditional speech-to-text architectures (upto 4.2% WER improvements), they do not incorporate visual information when the audio signal has been corrupted. This shows that current methods of integrating the visual modality do not improve model robustness to noise, and we need better visually grounded adaptation techniques.
Card 3 · Multimodal machine translation through visuals and speech
Abstract Multimodal machine translation involves drawing information from more than one modality, based on the assumption that the additional modalities will contain useful alternative views of the input data. The most prominent tasks in this area are spoken language translation, image-guided transl…
Read full passage excerpt
Abstract Multimodal machine translation involves drawing information from more than one modality, based on the assumption that the additional modalities will contain useful alternative views of the input data. The most prominent tasks in this area are spoken language translation, image-guided translation, and video-guided translation, which exploit audio and visual modalities, respectively. These tasks are distinguished from their monolingual counterparts of speech recognition, image captioning, and video captioning by the requirement of models to generate outputs in a different language. This survey reviews the major data resources for these tasks, the evaluation campaigns concentrated around them, the state of the art in end-to-end and pipeline approaches, and also the challenges in performance evaluation. The paper concludes with a discussion of directions for future research in these areas: the need for more expansive and challenging datasets, for targeted evaluations of model perf …
Card 4 · Object Referring in Visual Scene with Spoken Language
Object referring has important applications, especially for human-machine interaction. While having received great attention, the task is mainly attacked with written language (text) as input rather than spoken language (speech), which is more natural. This paper investigates Object Referring with S…
Read full passage excerpt
Object referring has important applications, especially for human-machine interaction. While having received great attention, the task is mainly attacked with written language (text) as input rather than spoken language (speech), which is more natural. This paper investigates Object Referring with Spoken Language (ORSpoken) by presenting two datasets and one novel approach. Objects are annotated with their locations in images, text descriptions and speech descriptions. This makes the datasets ideal for multi-modality learning. The approach is developed by carefully taking down ORSpoken problem into three sub-problems and introducing taskspecific vision-language interactions at the corresponding levels. Experiments show that our method outperforms competing methods consistently and significantly. The approach is also evaluated in the presence of audio noise, showing the efficacy of the proposed vision-language interaction methods in counteracting background noise.
Model-reported card use
The model did not report that any card materially affected this completion.