← Back to all development cases
This case was judged by an anonymized AI reviewer and has not been independently reviewed by people; inspect the draft, cards, and both outputs to assess it.
AutocompleteWithout cards better117 / 280 · beu-400cbe7205241477

Semi-discrete quadratic Wasserstein energy and state-dependent Langevin exploration

Mathematics · 2609.03405v1

FLOWING EVIDENCE BENCHMARK

How do we compare writing with and without cards?

At the same writing position, the same model produces one first result with cards and one without. All 280 pairs enter the overall anonymized review, which assesses whether a decision not to continue fits the draft.

Overall: 138 with-card wins, 26 ties, 107 no-card wins, 5 pairs where neither was usable, and 4 inconclusive judgments. Both sides wrote text in 218 pairs; 48 had a deliberate stop and 14 included an invalid output.

SAME DRAFT · WITH OR WITHOUT CARDS

01 · FIXED WRITING POSITION

MANUSCRIPT

Same writing position ▌

Matched autocomplete at the same draft position

02 · TWO MATCHED VERSIONS

SHARED BY BOTH

Draft, writing task, and generation model

A · With cards

Relevant literature cards supplied

B · Without cards

No literature cards supplied

Generation model

Same model and version

A → first output

B → first output

Anonymized AI judge

First outputs are anonymized as X and Y

Continuation review: accuracy, fit to the writing task and usability
Returns: X preferred / tie / Y preferred / both unusable

Review again with the answer order swapped

HOW DOES BLIND JUDGING WORK?

① Anonymize both outputs
The AI judge sees the same draft and both first outputs without knowing which received cards.

② Compare and swap order
The judge applies task-specific criteria in X/Y and then Y/X order.

③ Review disagreements
A third pass resolves disagreements. Incomplete reviews remain in the denominator.

How are positions and cards selected?

We selected 40 writing positions in each of seven fields, for 280 comparisons. The position and relevant literature cards were set before each comparison, so both versions began from the same draft.

The main result retains every frozen position, including places where cards might not add a useful next move. This avoids selecting cases based on their outputs, but 49% describes the whole cohort, not a win rate where evidence clearly had an opportunity to help. This cohort did not record that opportunity label for each position before generation, so those two groups cannot yet be separated reliably.

CARD USE · 140/280

Reported card use in continuations with text

The model reports whether a card affected its continuation. In 140 of 280 tests it produced continuation text and reported card use. The previous count of 150 included 10 cases without continuation text and has been corrected.

COMPARISON · 70 / 7 / 30

Which written version was better?

Of the 107 reported-use cases where both versions produced text, the blinded AI judge preferred the with-card version 70 times, found 7 about the same, and preferred the without-card version 30 times.

How are the two table percentages calculated?

ADOPTION COVERAGE

140reported use with text
÷
280all positions
=
50%

WITH-CARD VERSION PREFERRED

70with cards better
÷
107comparable tests
=
65%

The percentages use different groups: 50% counts continuations with text reporting card use among all 280 tests; 65% covers the 107 such cases with text on both sides. The generating model reports card use, while an anonymized AI judge compares writing quality.

Card use is self-reported by the generator. The anonymized AI judge sees the draft and source snippets, so source-aware preference remains possible; there was no independent human review. The overall result describes these 280 frozen positions, not a win probability for any writing task.

Manuscript writing position

Text excerpt · not a PDF page

Research manuscript · excerpt

Semi-discrete quadratic Wasserstein energy and state-dependent Langevin exploration

Introduction / related work

n; geometric ergodicity. 1 Introduction Approximating a continuous probability measure by a finitel y supported measure with prescribed atomic masses is a basic problem in semi-discrete optimal tr ansport. In capacitated location and urban-planning models, the target measure describes the sp atial distribution of demand, the sites ∗NITFID, School of Statistics and Data Science, Nankai Unive rsity. [email protected] †MICS, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay. [email protected]. This work was supported by the grant ANR-25-CE40-0714 (MATH-SPA). ‡School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University. [email protected] 1 arXiv:2609.03405v1 [math.NA] 3 Sep 2026

represent facilities, and the prescribed masses represent their capacities. Closely related formula- tions arise in vector quantization, centroidal Voronoi and Laguerre tessellations, point-cloud ap- proximation, and numerical integration; see [ 2, 6, 10, 1, 15]. A natural deterministic method in the present fixed-mass setting is the weighted Lloyd iterati on: one first constructs the Laguerre cells having the prescribed masses and then moves each site t o the barycenter of its cell. Conver- gence properties of

↓ Next paragraph was generated here

The highlighted text is near the writing position. This is a layout of the evaluation input, not a PDF screenshot.

A matched comparison at the same writing positionOverall AI review: Without cards better

Both arms use the same model, task and manuscript context. Only the retrieved passages differ. The first recorded output from each arm is shown below.

Read overall AI review rationale

A = without cards · B = with cards

Both outputs complete the interrupted sentence about convergence properties of weighted Lloyd iteration and are grammatically and factually plausible. However, Output A is preferable because it more precisely specifies 'gradient flows of the semi-discrete quadratic Wasserstein energy' and crucially adds 'where the prescribed masses constrain the admissible Laguerre tessellations.' This additional clause directly ties back to the draft's emphasis on the 'fixed-mass setting' and 'prescribed masses' mentioned in the introduction, making the continuation more tightly integrated with the manuscript's specific problem formulation. Output B's 'gradient descent on the quadratic Wasserstein energy' is slightly less precise (gradient flows vs gradient descent) and omits the explicit connection to the mass constraints that define this particular problem variant. The draft explicitly sets up 'prescribed atomic masses' and 'capacities' as central features, so Output A's continuation better preserves the argument's focus.

Evidence

Same model and position · retrieved passages supplied · first output

Not preferred in this comparison

the weighted Lloyd iteration in the fixed-mass setting have been studied through the lens of semi-discrete optimal transport, where the iteration is interpreted as a gradient descent on the quadratic Wasserstein energy.

Passages supplied to the Evidence version

Card 1 · Centroidal power diagrams, Lloyd's algorithm and applications to optimal location problems

In this paper we develop a numerical method for solving a class of optimization problems known as optimal location or quantization problems. The target energy can be written either in terms of atomic measures and the Wasserstein distance or in terms of weighted points and power diagrams (generalized…

Read full passage excerpt

In this paper we develop a numerical method for solving a class of optimization problems known as optimal location or quantization problems. The target energy can be written either in terms of atomic measures and the Wasserstein distance or in terms of weighted points and power diagrams (generalized Voronoi diagrams). The latter formulation is more suitable for computation. We show that critical points of the energy are centroidal power diagrams, which are generalizations of centroidal Voronoi tessellations, and that they can be approximated by a generalization of Lloyd's algorithm (Lloyd's algorithm is a common method for finding centroidal Voronoi tessellations). We prove that the algorithm is energy decreasing and prove a convergence theorem. Numerical experiments suggest that the algorithm converges linearly. We illustrate the algorithm in two and three dimensions using simple models of optimal location and crystallization. In particular, we test a conjecture about the optimality o …

Card 2 · A Lagrangian method for solving the spherical shallow water equations using power diagrams

Numerical simulations of the air in the atmosphere and water in the oceans are essential for numerical weather prediction. The state-of-the-art for performing these fluid simulations relies on an Eulerian viewpoint, in which the fluid domain is discretized into a mesh, and the governing equations de…

Read full passage excerpt

Numerical simulations of the air in the atmosphere and water in the oceans are essential for numerical weather prediction. The state-of-the-art for performing these fluid simulations relies on an Eulerian viewpoint, in which the fluid domain is discretized into a mesh, and the governing equations describe the fluid motion as it passes through each cell of the mesh. However, it is unclear whether a Lagrangian viewpoint, in which the fluid is discretized by a collection of particles, can outperform Eulerian simulations in global atmospheric simulations. To date, Lagrangian approaches have shown promise, but tend to produce smoother solutions. In this work, a new Lagrangian method is developed to simulate the atmosphere in which particles are represented with spherical power cells. We introduce an efficient algorithm for computing these cells which are then used to discretize the spherical shallow water equations. Mass conservation is enforced by solving a semi-discrete optimal transport …

Card 3 · Discrete Optimal Transport: Rapid Convergence of Simulated Annealing Algorithms

We develop a discrete optimal transport framework for analyzing simulated annealing algorithms on finite state spaces. Building on the discrete Wasserstein metric introduced by Maas (J. Funct. Anal., 2011), we define a generalized discrete Wasserstein-2 distance and the associated notion of \emph{di…

Read full passage excerpt

We develop a discrete optimal transport framework for analyzing simulated annealing algorithms on finite state spaces. Building on the discrete Wasserstein metric introduced by Maas (J. Funct. Anal., 2011), we define a generalized discrete Wasserstein-2 distance and the associated notion of \emph{discrete action} for paths of probability measures on graphs. Using these tools, we establish non-asymptotic convergence guarantees for simulated annealing: the KL divergence between the algorithm's output and the target distribution is controlled by the discrete action of the annealing path. This can be viewed as the discrete counterpart of the action-based analysis of annealed Langevin dynamics in continuous spaces by Guo, Tao, and Chen (ICLR 2025). As applications, we analyze simulated annealing for two fundamental models in statistical physics. For the \emph{mean-field Ising model}, we show that annealed single-site Glauber dynamics achieves $\varepsilon$ error in KL divergence in $O(n^5β^ …

Card 4 · Higher-dimensional power diagrams for semi-discrete optimal transport

Efficient algorithms for solving optimal transport problems are important for measuring and optimizing distances between functions. In the $L^2$ semi-discrete context, this problem consists of finding a map from a continuous density function to a discrete set of points so as to minimize the transpor…

Read full passage excerpt

Efficient algorithms for solving optimal transport problems are important for measuring and optimizing distances between functions. In the $L^2$ semi-discrete context, this problem consists of finding a map from a continuous density function to a discrete set of points so as to minimize the transport cost, using the squared Euclidean distance as the cost function. This has important applications in image stippling, clustering, resource allocation and in generating blue noise point distributions for rendering. Recent algorithms have been developed for solving the semi-discrete problem in $2d$ and $3d$, however, algorithms in higher dimensions have yet to be demonstrated, which rely on the efficient calculation of the power diagram (Laguerre diagram) in higher dimensions. Here, we introduce an algorithm for computing power diagrams, which extends to any topological dimension. We first evaluate the performance of the algorithm in $2d-6d$. We then restrict our attention to four-dimensional …

Card 5 · A Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport Scheme for the Semi-Geostrophic Slice Compressible Model

We develop a semi-discrete optimal transport scheme for the compressible semi-geostrophic equations, a system that plays an important role in modelling large-scale atmospheric dynamics and frontogenesis. Unlike the incompressible case, the compressible equations involve variable density and internal…

Read full passage excerpt

We develop a semi-discrete optimal transport scheme for the compressible semi-geostrophic equations, a system that plays an important role in modelling large-scale atmospheric dynamics and frontogenesis. Unlike the incompressible case, the compressible equations involve variable density and internal energy, but can be recast into a variational framework that naturally couples the dynamics with an optimal transport formulation. This is done by a change to the so-called geostrophic coordinates, via a transformation inspired by the incompressible case. The discrete version of this variational formulation provides the basis for a numerical particle scheme. The implementation of this scheme presents considerable challenges, due to a non-quadratic cost function and parabolic $c$-Laguerre cells. To address these challenges, we use $c$-exponential charts to construct $c$-Laguerre tessellations efficiently, ensuring conservation of mass and energy while preserving key geometric structures. We a …

Model-reported card use

Card 1 · fact

Affected output: the weighted Lloyd iteration in the fixed-mass setting have been studied through the lens of semi-discrete optimal transport

Model explanation: The row supplies the fact that Lloyd-type algorithms are connected to power-diagram energy minimization, which grounds the claim about convergence studies of the weighted Lloyd iteration.

No Evidence

Same model and position · no retrieved passages · first output

Preferred by blind review

the weighted Lloyd iteration in the fixed-mass setting have been studied through the lens of gradient flows of the semi-discrete quadratic Wasserstein energy, where the prescribed masses constrain the admissible Laguerre tessellations.

Earlier card-use comparison

The earlier diagnostic compared only cases with reported card use and text on both sides; its scope differs from the overall AI review above.

The blind model judge did not prefer either output.

Read the original model judgment

Order-swapped judges disagreed. Pass 1: Both outputs provide coherent, relevant continuations grounded in the draft and sources. However, Output B is more precise and complete. The draft establishes: (1) fixed-mass setting with prescribed atomic masses, (2) weighted Lloyd iteration involving Laguerre cells with prescribed masses, and (3) the method moves sites to barycenters. Output B preserves the 'prescribed masses' constraint explicitly ('where the prescribed masses constrain the admissible Laguerre tessellations'), which directly mirrors the draft's emphasis on 'prescribed masses' and 'capacities.' Output A omits this constraint, making it slightly less faithful to the draft's specific formulation. The sources support both: source [1] discusses Lloyd's algorithm for centroidal power diagrams with energy decreasing properties; source [4] discusses higher-dimensional power diagrams for semi-discrete optimal transport with prescribed masses. Output B's 'gradient flows' framing is slightly more accurate than 'gradient descent' in Output A given the optimal transport context where gradient flow structures are standard (supported by source [3]'s discrete Wasserstein framework and source [5]'s variational formulation). Output B better preserves the full argument by maintaining both the mathematical structure (gradient flows) and the physical constraint (prescribed masses constrain admissible tessellations) that the draft has established. Pass 2: Both outputs provide coherent continuations grounded in the general topic of semi-discrete optimal transport and Lloyd iterations. However, Output B is preferable because it is more directly supported by the sources and avoids an unsupported specificity. Output A claims the studies use 'gradient flows of the semi-discrete quadratic Wasserstein energy, where the prescribed masses constrain the admissible Laguerre tessellations.' The phrase 'gradient flows' is a more specific mathematical framework than what is directly evidenced in the sources. The first source mentions Lloyd's algorithm is 'energy decreasing' and discusses 'centroidal power diagrams,' but does not use the term 'gradient flows.' Output B's phrasing 'interpreted as a gradient descent on the quadratic Wasserstein energy' is more cautious and aligns better with the first source's description of Lloyd's algorithm as 'energy decreasing' — a property consistent with gradient descent. Both outputs correctly avoid inventing specific convergence results from this paper, but Output B's more measured terminology ('gradient descent' vs 'gradient flows') and simpler claim structure makes it more safely grounded while preserving the draft's meaning and scope.

The passages are input material; their presence does not mean an output used them or that they support every claim. Draft and source passages are excerpted; no simulated scores or PDF appear here.