← Back to all development cases
This case was judged by an anonymized AI reviewer and has not been independently reviewed by people; inspect the draft, cards, and both outputs to assess it.
AutocompleteWithout cards better23 / 280 · beu-ab3eea02bddc032d

Goodness-of-fit tests for spatial point processes: A review

Statistics · 2501.03732v1

FLOWING EVIDENCE BENCHMARK

How do we compare writing with and without cards?

At the same writing position, the same model produces one first result with cards and one without. All 280 pairs enter the overall anonymized review, which assesses whether a decision not to continue fits the draft.

Overall: 138 with-card wins, 26 ties, 107 no-card wins, 5 pairs where neither was usable, and 4 inconclusive judgments. Both sides wrote text in 218 pairs; 48 had a deliberate stop and 14 included an invalid output.

SAME DRAFT · WITH OR WITHOUT CARDS

01 · FIXED WRITING POSITION

MANUSCRIPT

Same writing position ▌

Matched autocomplete at the same draft position

02 · TWO MATCHED VERSIONS

SHARED BY BOTH

Draft, writing task, and generation model

A · With cards

Relevant literature cards supplied

B · Without cards

No literature cards supplied

Generation model

Same model and version

A → first output

B → first output

Anonymized AI judge

First outputs are anonymized as X and Y

Continuation review: accuracy, fit to the writing task and usability
Returns: X preferred / tie / Y preferred / both unusable

Review again with the answer order swapped

HOW DOES BLIND JUDGING WORK?

① Anonymize both outputs
The AI judge sees the same draft and both first outputs without knowing which received cards.

② Compare and swap order
The judge applies task-specific criteria in X/Y and then Y/X order.

③ Review disagreements
A third pass resolves disagreements. Incomplete reviews remain in the denominator.

How are positions and cards selected?

We selected 40 writing positions in each of seven fields, for 280 comparisons. The position and relevant literature cards were set before each comparison, so both versions began from the same draft.

The main result retains every frozen position, including places where cards might not add a useful next move. This avoids selecting cases based on their outputs, but 49% describes the whole cohort, not a win rate where evidence clearly had an opportunity to help. This cohort did not record that opportunity label for each position before generation, so those two groups cannot yet be separated reliably.

CARD USE · 140/280

Reported card use in continuations with text

The model reports whether a card affected its continuation. In 140 of 280 tests it produced continuation text and reported card use. The previous count of 150 included 10 cases without continuation text and has been corrected.

COMPARISON · 70 / 7 / 30

Which written version was better?

Of the 107 reported-use cases where both versions produced text, the blinded AI judge preferred the with-card version 70 times, found 7 about the same, and preferred the without-card version 30 times.

How are the two table percentages calculated?

ADOPTION COVERAGE

140reported use with text
÷
280all positions
=
50%

WITH-CARD VERSION PREFERRED

70with cards better
÷
107comparable tests
=
65%

The percentages use different groups: 50% counts continuations with text reporting card use among all 280 tests; 65% covers the 107 such cases with text on both sides. The generating model reports card use, while an anonymized AI judge compares writing quality.

Card use is self-reported by the generator. The anonymized AI judge sees the draft and source snippets, so source-aware preference remains possible; there was no independent human review. The overall result describes these 280 frozen positions, not a win probability for any writing task.

Manuscript writing position

Text excerpt · not a PDF page

Research manuscript · excerpt

Goodness-of-fit tests for spatial point processes: A review

8 Discussion and future research

Many possible combinations of test statistic and functional summary statistic have not yet been investigated.

…n is the introduction of a unifying notation which allows to establish a general framework for goodness-of-fit tests based on functional summary statistics. These summaries are based on either probabilistic, geometric or topological descriptors of point processes. Several options for test statistics and corresponding orderings are introduced. Thus, our framework contains a large number of different goodness-of-fit tests. Additionally, we also discussed several practical aspects of the tests such as the estimation of unknown quantities and the necessary number of simulations of the null model.

↓ Next paragraph was generated here

The highlighted text is near the writing position. This is a layout of the evaluation input, not a PDF screenshot.

A matched comparison at the same writing positionOverall AI review: Without cards better

Both arms use the same model, task and manuscript context. Only the retrieved passages differ. The first recorded output from each arm is shown below.

Read overall AI review rationale

A = with cards · B = without cards

Both outputs provide plausible continuations, but B fits better with the draft's specific argument. The draft emphasizes that 'many possible combinations...have not yet been investigated' and introduces 'a large number of different goodness-of-fit tests' with 'several options for test statistics and corresponding orderings.' Output B directly addresses this by proposing to compare power across these different combinations, which matches the draft's focus on the multiplicity of tests and the need to navigate choices among them. Output A shifts to 'theoretical underpinning' and 'asymptotic behaviour,' which is somewhat generic and less connected to the draft's emphasis on practical, comparative aspects of the framework. The draft already discussed 'practical aspects,' making B's focus on systematic comparison of power and informativeness of different statistics a more natural next move.

Evidence

Same model and position · retrieved passages supplied · first output

Not preferred in this comparison

A further direction concerns the theoretical underpinning of the tests. While the asymptotic behaviour of many test statistics under the null hypothesis is well understood, their power properties against specific alternatives have received comparatively little attention, and a systematic study of consistency and local power would strengthen the practical guidance available to applied researchers.

Passages supplied to the Evidence version

Card 1 · Multivariate goodness-of-fit tests based on Wasserstein distance

Goodness-of-fit tests based on the empirical Wasserstein distance are proposed for simple and composite null hypotheses involving general multivariate distributions. For group families, the procedure is to be implemented after preliminary reduction of the data via invariance. This property allows fo…

Read full passage excerpt

Goodness-of-fit tests based on the empirical Wasserstein distance are proposed for simple and composite null hypotheses involving general multivariate distributions. For group families, the procedure is to be implemented after preliminary reduction of the data via invariance. This property allows for calculation of exact critical values and p-values at finite sample sizes. Applications include testing for location–scale families and testing for families arising from affine transformations, such as elliptical distributions with given standard radial density and unspecified location vector and scatter matrix. A novel test for multivariate normality with unspecified mean vector and covariance matrix arises as a special case. For more general parametric families, we propose a parametric bootstrap procedure to calculate critical values. The lack of asymptotic distribution theory for the empirical Wasserstein distance means that the validity of the parametric bootstrap under the null hypothe …

Card 2 · Goodness-of-fit tests for the functional linear model based on randomly projected empirical processes

We consider marked empirical processes indexed by a randomly projected functional covariate to construct goodness-of-fit tests for the functional linear model with scalar response. The test statistics are built from continuous functionals over the projected process, resulting in computationally effi…

Read full passage excerpt

We consider marked empirical processes indexed by a randomly projected functional covariate to construct goodness-of-fit tests for the functional linear model with scalar response. The test statistics are built from continuous functionals over the projected process, resulting in computationally efficient tests that exhibit root-$n$ convergence rates and circumvent the curse of dimensionality. The weak convergence of the empirical process is obtained conditionally on a random direction, whilst the almost surely equivalence between the testing for significance expressed on the original and on the projected functional covariate is proved. The computation of the test in practice involves calibration by wild bootstrap resampling and the combination of several $p$-values, arising from different projections, by means of the false discovery rate method. The finite sample properties of the tests are illustrated in a simulation study for a variety of linear models, underlying processes, and alte …

Card 3 · Asymptotic Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Point Processes Based on Scaled Empirical K-Functions

This result suggests discrepancy measures between empirical and theoretical K K -function with known limit distribution which allow to perform goodness-of-fit tests for checking a hypothesized point process based only on its intensity and (generalized) K K -function. Similar test statistics are deri…

Read full passage excerpt

This result suggests discrepancy measures between empirical and theoretical K K -function with known limit distribution which allow to perform goodness-of-fit tests for checking a hypothesized point process based only on its intensity and (generalized) K K -function. Similar test statistics are derived for testing the hypothesis that two independent point processes in W n W_{n} have the same distribution without explicit knowledge of their intensities and K K -functions.

Card 4 · Goodness-of-fit tests for complete spatial randomness based on Minkowski functionals of binary images

We propose a class of goodness-of-fit tests for complete spatial randomness (CSR). In contrast to standard tests, our procedure utilizes a transformation of the data to a binary image, which is then characterized by geometric functionals. Under a suitable limiting regime, we derive the asymptotic di…

Read full passage excerpt

We propose a class of goodness-of-fit tests for complete spatial randomness (CSR). In contrast to standard tests, our procedure utilizes a transformation of the data to a binary image, which is then characterized by geometric functionals. Under a suitable limiting regime, we derive the asymptotic distribution of the test statistics under the null hypothesis and almost sure limits under certain alternatives. The new tests are computationally efficient, and simulations show that they are strong competitors to other tests of CSR. The tests are applied to a real data set in gamma-ray astronomy, and immediate extensions are presented to encourage further work.

Card 5 · Residuals and Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Stationary Marked Gibbs Point Processes

Summary The inspection of residuals is a fundamental step for investigating the quality of adjustment of a parametric model to data. For spatial point processes, the concept of residuals has been recently proposed as an empirical counterpart of the Campbell equilibrium equation for marked Gibbs poin…

Read full passage excerpt

Summary The inspection of residuals is a fundamental step for investigating the quality of adjustment of a parametric model to data. For spatial point processes, the concept of residuals has been recently proposed as an empirical counterpart of the Campbell equilibrium equation for marked Gibbs point processes. The paper focuses on stationary marked Gibbs point processes and deals with asymptotic properties of residuals for such processes. In particular, the consistency and the asymptotic normality are obtained for a wide class of residuals including the classical residuals (raw, inverse and Pearson). On the basis of these asymptotic results, we define goodness-of-fit tests with type I error theoretically controlled. One of these tests constitutes an extension of the quadrat counting test that is widely used to test the null hypothesis of a homogeneous Poisson point process.

Model-reported card use

The model did not report that any card materially affected this completion.

No Evidence

Same model and position · no retrieved passages · first output

Preferred by blind review

A natural next step is to compare the power of the different tests within this framework under a range of alternative models, since the choice of test statistic and ordering may strongly affect the ability to detect departures from the null model. Such a systematic comparison would also clarify which functional summary statistics are most informative for particular classes of point process alternatives.

Earlier card-use comparison

The earlier diagnostic compared only cases with reported card use and text on both sides; its scope differs from the overall AI review above.

This case does not have both with-card continuation text and a model-reported use record. It remains among all 280 tests but does not enter the reported-use comparison.

The passages are input material; their presence does not mean an output used them or that they support every claim. Draft and source passages are excerpted; no simulated scores or PDF appear here.