← Back to all development cases
This case was judged by an anonymized AI reviewer and has not been independently reviewed by people; inspect the draft, cards, and both outputs to assess it.
AutocompleteWithout cards better37 / 280 · beu-b9a69d8cd3be7f68

An Overview and Recent Developments in the Analysis of Multistate Processes

Statistics · 2502.06492v1

FLOWING EVIDENCE BENCHMARK

How do we compare writing with and without cards?

At the same writing position, the same model produces one first result with cards and one without. All 280 pairs enter the overall anonymized review, which assesses whether a decision not to continue fits the draft.

Overall: 138 with-card wins, 26 ties, 107 no-card wins, 5 pairs where neither was usable, and 4 inconclusive judgments. Both sides wrote text in 218 pairs; 48 had a deliberate stop and 14 included an invalid output.

SAME DRAFT · WITH OR WITHOUT CARDS

01 · FIXED WRITING POSITION

MANUSCRIPT

Same writing position ▌

Matched autocomplete at the same draft position

02 · TWO MATCHED VERSIONS

SHARED BY BOTH

Draft, writing task, and generation model

A · With cards

Relevant literature cards supplied

B · Without cards

No literature cards supplied

Generation model

Same model and version

A → first output

B → first output

Anonymized AI judge

First outputs are anonymized as X and Y

Continuation review: accuracy, fit to the writing task and usability
Returns: X preferred / tie / Y preferred / both unusable

Review again with the answer order swapped

HOW DOES BLIND JUDGING WORK?

① Anonymize both outputs
The AI judge sees the same draft and both first outputs without knowing which received cards.

② Compare and swap order
The judge applies task-specific criteria in X/Y and then Y/X order.

③ Review disagreements
A third pass resolves disagreements. Incomplete reviews remain in the denominator.

How are positions and cards selected?

We selected 40 writing positions in each of seven fields, for 280 comparisons. The position and relevant literature cards were set before each comparison, so both versions began from the same draft.

The main result retains every frozen position, including places where cards might not add a useful next move. This avoids selecting cases based on their outputs, but 49% describes the whole cohort, not a win rate where evidence clearly had an opportunity to help. This cohort did not record that opportunity label for each position before generation, so those two groups cannot yet be separated reliably.

CARD USE · 140/280

Reported card use in continuations with text

The model reports whether a card affected its continuation. In 140 of 280 tests it produced continuation text and reported card use. The previous count of 150 included 10 cases without continuation text and has been corrected.

COMPARISON · 70 / 7 / 30

Which written version was better?

Of the 107 reported-use cases where both versions produced text, the blinded AI judge preferred the with-card version 70 times, found 7 about the same, and preferred the without-card version 30 times.

How are the two table percentages calculated?

ADOPTION COVERAGE

140reported use with text
÷
280all positions
=
50%

WITH-CARD VERSION PREFERRED

70with cards better
÷
107comparable tests
=
65%

The percentages use different groups: 50% counts continuations with text reporting card use among all 280 tests; 65% covers the 107 such cases with text on both sides. The generating model reports card use, while an anonymized AI judge compares writing quality.

Card use is self-reported by the generator. The anonymized AI judge sees the draft and source snippets, so source-aware preference remains possible; there was no independent human review. The overall result describes these 280 frozen positions, not a win probability for any writing task.

Manuscript writing position

Text excerpt · not a PDF page

Research manuscript · excerpt

An Overview and Recent Developments in the Analysis of Multistate Processes

1 Introduction > 1.1 Background

… dissolution of marriages ( Espenshade and Braun, 1982 ) , or changes in the employment status of individuals in the workforce ( Zarghami et al., 2024 ) . Careful modeling of process dynamics can yield valuable scientific insights regarding the natural disease course, risk factors for disease onset and progression, and intervention effects. Multistate models also offer a useful framework for the specification of joint models for time-dependent covariate processes and disease processes of interest; such models can improve understanding of the dynamic relationship between two or more processes.

…a countably number of states can also be modeled (e.g. recurrent event processes) ( Cook and Lawless, 2018 ) . There is often a subset of states that can be entered directly from a given state with this subset determined from the context. Fig. 1 contains some illustrative state-space diagrams representing some of the rich variety of processes that can be analyzed using multistate models. The arrows in a state-space diagram represent the transitions that can be made directly. When processes can terminate, the set of absorbing states from which individuals cannot exit is denoted by 𝒜 {\cal A} .

Fig. 1 a) is a two-state diagram representing a simple failure process with state 0 a transient state and state 1 an absorbing state entered upon failure. Fig. 1 b) is a multistate diagram representing a recurrent

↓ Next paragraph was generated here

The highlighted text is near the writing position. This is a layout of the evaluation input, not a PDF screenshot.

A matched comparison at the same writing positionOverall AI review: Without cards better

Both arms use the same model, task and manuscript context. Only the retrieved passages differ. The first recorded output from each arm is shown below.

Read overall AI review rationale

A = without cards · B = with cards

The draft describes Fig. 1 a) as a simple failure process with transient state 0 and absorbing state 1, then introduces Fig. 1 b) as 'a multistate diagram representing a recurrent...' The task is to complete this sentence defining what a recurrent process is in this context. Output A completes the sentence with 'event process in which a transient state is entered repeatedly over time, with each entry corresponding to a new event.' This is accurate and fits well: 'recurrent event process' is standard terminology, and the description of repeated entry to a transient state with each entry as a new event correctly generalizes from the simple two-state failure process to a multistate recurrent process framework. The scope is appropriate and the text inserts cleanly. Output B claims individuals 'move back and forth between a transient state and an absorbing state.' This is a material contradiction: by definition, an absorbing state cannot be left—once entered, the process remains there forever. The description of 'move back and forth' between transient and absorbing states is mathematically impossible and contradicts the draft's own definition of state 1 as 'an absorbing state entered upon failure.' This makes Output B unusable due to a concrete, material error about absorbing states.

Evidence

Same model and position · retrieved passages supplied · first output

Not preferred in this comparison

event process in which individuals move back and forth between a transient state and an absorbing state, with each visit to the transient state marking the start of a new episode.

Passages supplied to the Evidence version

Card 1 · Bayesian blockwise inference for joint models of longitudinal and multistate processes

However, in many application contexts, more complicated event processes may arise. For instance, a subject of interest may experience a succession of intermediate events, each representing a disease/health status. Multistate models (MSM) extend the traditional survival model to encompass more states…

Read full passage excerpt

However, in many application contexts, more complicated event processes may arise. For instance, a subject of interest may experience a succession of intermediate events, each representing a disease/health status. Multistate models (MSM) extend the traditional survival model to encompass more states, providing a useful probabilistic framework for modelling complex longitudinal event history data ( Cook and Lawless,, 2018 ) . Well-known models such as competing risks and illness-death models are special cases of MSM. MSM can be conveniently specified via a collection of time-to-event models, one for each permitted transition between two states. They have recently been incorporated into joint models, typically by linking the longitudinal and transition-specific regression models via shared random effects, allowing inference of association patterns between markers and different transitions.

Card 2 · Markov Rewards Processes with Impulse Rewards and Absorbing States

We study the expected accumulated reward for a discrete-time Markov reward model with absorbing states. The rewards are impulse rewards, where a reward $ρ_{ij}$ is accumulated when transitioning from state $i$ to state $j$. We derive an explicit, single-letter expression for the expected accumulated…

Read full passage excerpt

We study the expected accumulated reward for a discrete-time Markov reward model with absorbing states. The rewards are impulse rewards, where a reward $ρ_{ij}$ is accumulated when transitioning from state $i$ to state $j$. We derive an explicit, single-letter expression for the expected accumulated reward as a function of the number of time steps $n$ and include in our analysis the limit in which $n \to \infty$.

Card 3 · On the Use and Misuse of Absorbing States in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning

The creation and destruction of agents in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is a critically under-explored area of research. Current MARL algorithms often assume that the number of agents within a group remains fixed throughout an experiment. However, in many practical problems,…

Read full passage excerpt

The creation and destruction of agents in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is a critically under-explored area of research. Current MARL algorithms often assume that the number of agents within a group remains fixed throughout an experiment. However, in many practical problems, an agent may terminate before their teammates. This early termination issue presents a challenge: the terminated agent must learn from the group's success or failure which occurs beyond its own existence. We refer to propagating value from rewards earned by remaining teammates to terminated agents as the Posthumous Credit Assignment problem. Current MARL methods handle this problem by placing these agents in an absorbing state until the entire group of agents reaches a termination condition. Although absorbing states enable existing algorithms and APIs to handle terminated agents without modification, practical training efficiency and resource use problems exist. In this work, we first demon …

Card 4 · Phase transitions of extended-range probabilistic cellular automata with two absorbing states

We study phase transitions in a long-range one-dimensional cellular automaton with two symmetric absorbing states. It includes and extends several other models, like the Ising and Domany-Kinzel ones. It is characterized by competing ferromagnetic linear and antiferromagnetic nonlinear couplings. Des…

Read full passage excerpt

We study phase transitions in a long-range one-dimensional cellular automaton with two symmetric absorbing states. It includes and extends several other models, like the Ising and Domany-Kinzel ones. It is characterized by competing ferromagnetic linear and antiferromagnetic nonlinear couplings. Despite its simplicity, this model exhibits an extremely rich phase diagram. We present numerical results and mean-field approximations.

Card 5 · Quasi-stationary distributions for stochastic processes with an absorbing state

We study the long-time behaviour of stochastic models with an absorbing state, conditioned on survival. For a large class of processes, in which saturation prevents unlimited growth, statistical properties of the surviving sample attain time-independent limiting values. We may then define a quasi-st…

Read full passage excerpt

We study the long-time behaviour of stochastic models with an absorbing state, conditioned on survival. For a large class of processes, in which saturation prevents unlimited growth, statistical properties of the surviving sample attain time-independent limiting values. We may then define a quasi-stationary probability distribution as one in which the ratios p n ( t )/ p m ( t ) (for any pair of non-absorbing states n and m ) are time-independent. This is not a true stationary distribution, since the overall normalization decays as probability flows irreversibly to the absorbing state. We construct quasi-stationary solutions for the contact process on a complete graph, the Malthus–Verhulst process, Schlögl's second model and the voter model on a complete graph. We also construct the master equation and quasi-stationary state in a two-site approximation for the contact process and for a pair of competing Malthus–Verhulst processes.

Model-reported card use

The model did not report that any card materially affected this completion.

No Evidence

Same model and position · no retrieved passages · first output

Preferred by blind review

event process in which a transient state is entered repeatedly over time, with each entry corresponding to a new event.

Earlier card-use comparison

The earlier diagnostic compared only cases with reported card use and text on both sides; its scope differs from the overall AI review above.

This case does not have both with-card continuation text and a model-reported use record. It remains among all 280 tests but does not enter the reported-use comparison.

The passages are input material; their presence does not mean an output used them or that they support every claim. Draft and source passages are excerpted; no simulated scores or PDF appear here.