FlowingFlowing
← Back to all development cases
This case was judged by an anonymized AI reviewer and has not been independently reviewed by people; inspect the draft, cards, and both outputs to assess it.
AutocompleteWithout cards better197 / 280 · beu-b4d2335ac6c95297

Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields

Astrophysics · 2412.18632v1

FLOWING EVIDENCE BENCHMARK

How do we compare writing with and without cards?

At the same writing position, the same model produces one first result with cards and one without. All 280 pairs enter the overall anonymized review, which assesses whether a decision not to continue fits the draft.

Overall: 138 with-card wins, 26 ties, 107 no-card wins, 5 pairs where neither was usable, and 4 inconclusive judgments. Both sides wrote text in 218 pairs; 48 had a deliberate stop and 14 included an invalid output.

SAME DRAFT · WITH OR WITHOUT CARDS

01 · FIXED WRITING POSITION

MANUSCRIPT

Same writing position ▌

Matched autocomplete at the same draft position

02 · TWO MATCHED VERSIONS

SHARED BY BOTH

Draft, writing task, and generation model

A · With cards

Relevant literature cards supplied

B · Without cards

No literature cards supplied

Generation model

Same model and version

A → first output

B → first output

Anonymized AI judge

First outputs are anonymized as X and Y

Continuation review: accuracy, fit to the writing task and usability
Returns: X preferred / tie / Y preferred / both unusable

Review again with the answer order swapped

HOW DOES BLIND JUDGING WORK?

① Anonymize both outputs
The AI judge sees the same draft and both first outputs without knowing which received cards.

② Compare and swap order
The judge applies task-specific criteria in X/Y and then Y/X order.

③ Review disagreements
A third pass resolves disagreements. Incomplete reviews remain in the denominator.

How are positions and cards selected?

We selected 40 writing positions in each of seven fields, for 280 comparisons. The position and relevant literature cards were set before each comparison, so both versions began from the same draft.

The main result retains every frozen position, including places where cards might not add a useful next move. This avoids selecting cases based on their outputs, but 49% describes the whole cohort, not a win rate where evidence clearly had an opportunity to help. This cohort did not record that opportunity label for each position before generation, so those two groups cannot yet be separated reliably.

CARD USE · 140/280

Reported card use in continuations with text

The model reports whether a card affected its continuation. In 140 of 280 tests it produced continuation text and reported card use. The previous count of 150 included 10 cases without continuation text and has been corrected.

COMPARISON · 70 / 7 / 30

Which written version was better?

Of the 107 reported-use cases where both versions produced text, the blinded AI judge preferred the with-card version 70 times, found 7 about the same, and preferred the without-card version 30 times.

How are the two table percentages calculated?

ADOPTION COVERAGE

140reported use with text
÷
280all positions
=
50%

WITH-CARD VERSION PREFERRED

70with cards better
÷
107comparable tests
=
65%

The percentages use different groups: 50% counts continuations with text reporting card use among all 280 tests; 65% covers the 107 such cases with text on both sides. The generating model reports card use, while an anonymized AI judge compares writing quality.

Card use is self-reported by the generator. The anonymized AI judge sees the draft and source snippets, so source-aware preference remains possible; there was no independent human review. The overall result describes these 280 frozen positions, not a win probability for any writing task.

Manuscript writing position

Text excerpt · not a PDF page

Research manuscript · excerpt

Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields

2 Magnetized mesons in the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model > 2.3 Summary

…ot consistent with ρ + \rho^{+} condensation for the considered range of values of e ​ B eB . The curve corresponding to a pointlike ρ + \rho^{+} meson is shown for comparison. It is worth mentioning that our results are qualitatively different from those obtained in other works [ 63 , 111 ] , which do find ρ + \rho^{+} meson condensation for e ​ B ∼ 0.2 eB\sim 0.2 to 0.6 0.6 GeV 2 in the framework of two-flavor NJL-like models. Contrary to what is done here, in those works Schwinger phases are neglected and it is assumed that charged π \pi and ρ \rho mesons lie in zero three-momentum states.

…pseudoscalar and vector meson sectors (red full and dashed line), neglecting the effect of the presence of axial vector mesons. It can be seen that the inclusion of the axial vector meson sector leads to an improvement of the agreement with LQCD data. We remark, however, that our numerical results indicate a monotonic enhancement of the charged pion energy with the magnetic field, in contrast with the nonmonotic behavior found by recent LQCD simulations, see Ref. [ 120 ] . It would be interesting to get more insight on this open issue from other effective models and further LQCD calculations.

↓ Next paragraph was generated here

The highlighted text is near the writing position. This is a layout of the evaluation input, not a PDF screenshot.

A matched comparison at the same writing positionOverall AI review: Without cards better

Both arms use the same model, task and manuscript context. Only the retrieved passages differ. The first recorded output from each arm is shown below.

Read overall AI review rationale

A = without cards · B = with cards

The draft ends with a clear concluding statement: 'It would be interesting to get more insight on this open issue from other effective models and further LQCD calculations.' This is a standard academic closing move that signals the end of the discussion. The paragraph before it already summarizes results and identifies an open issue. Continuing with more text would be redundant or speculative. Output A correctly recognizes this with 'complete'. Output B attempts to add a summary paragraph, but it introduces serious problems: (1) It claims 'the magnetized NJL model with Schwinger phases included yields a charged pion energy that grows monotonically with the magnetic field' — this is already stated in the draft, but then it introduces external information about 'two-flavor NJL model with a magnetic-field-dependent coupling constant fitted to LQCD pion masses' producing 'nonmonotonic pseudo-critical temperatures' and failing to 'simultaneously reproduce the chiral restoration temperature and the light meson mass spectra.' This material comes from the first source snippet about G(eB) coupling, which is not discussed anywhere in the visible draft. The draft never mentions magnetic-field-dependent coupling constants, pseudo-critical temperatures, or this specific LQCD fitting problem. This is a material topic drift that introduces claims about manuscript content that do not exist. The unsupported claim about what 'the two-flavor NJL model with a magnetic-field-dependent coupling constant' does is not just unsupported but actively contradicts the manuscript's scope as presented — the draft discusses a specific NJL calculation with Schwinger phases and axial vector mesons, not a G(eB)-modified model. This makes B unusable as it would require substantial repair to integrate, and readers would be misled about what the paper actually covers.

Evidence

Same model and position · retrieved passages supplied · first output

Not preferred in this comparison

In summary, the magnetized NJL model with Schwinger phases included yields a charged pion energy that grows monotonically with the magnetic field, whereas LQCD simulations report a nonmonotonic pion mass spectrum; the two-flavor NJL model with a magnetic-field-dependent coupling constant fitted to LQCD pion masses likewise produces nonmonotonic pseudo-critical temperatures, but cannot simultaneously reproduce the chiral restoration temperature and the light meson mass spectra.

Passages supplied to the Evidence version

Card 1 · LQCD constrained magnetic field dependent coupling constant in an effective model

A magnetic field dependent coupling constant $G(eB)$ is investigated in the two-flavor magnetized NJL model. Based on LQCD results of the neutral (charged) pion mass spectra at vanishing temperature and finite magnetic field, we determine the $G(eB)=G^0(eB)$ ($G(eB)=G^+(eB)$) in the NJL model. $G^0(…

Read full passage excerpt

A magnetic field dependent coupling constant $G(eB)$ is investigated in the two-flavor magnetized NJL model. Based on LQCD results of the neutral (charged) pion mass spectra at vanishing temperature and finite magnetic field, we determine the $G(eB)=G^0(eB)$ ($G(eB)=G^+(eB)$) in the NJL model. $G^0(eB)$ and $G^+(eB)$ are both non-monotonic functions of magnetic fields, but they are different from each other. Furthermore, we calculate the pseudo-critical temperatures $T_{pc}(eB)$ of chiral restoration phase transition with $G^0(eB)$ and $G^+(eB)$ in the magnetized NJL model, respectively. The resulting $T_{pc}(eB)$ are non-monotonic functions of magnetic fields. In previous work, $G(eB)$ in the NJL model fitted from the chiral condensate or pseudo-critical temperature of LQCD simulations is a decreasing function of magnetic field. It can not explain the saturation behavior of mass spectra of neutral pion and decreasing behavior of mass spectra of charged pion with strong magnetic field. …

Card 2 · Charged meson masses under strong magnetic fields: Gauge invariance and Schwinger phases

We study the role of the Schwinger phase (SP) that appears in the propagator of a charged particle in the presence of a static and uniform magnetic field $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{B}$. We first note that this phase cannot be removed by a gauge transformation; far from this, we show that i…

Read full passage excerpt

We study the role of the Schwinger phase (SP) that appears in the propagator of a charged particle in the presence of a static and uniform magnetic field $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{B}$. We first note that this phase cannot be removed by a gauge transformation; far from this, we show that it plays an important role in the restoration of the symmetries of the system. Next, we analyze the effect of SPs in the one-loop corrections to charged pion and rho meson self-energies. To carry out this analysis we consider first a simple form for the meson-quark interactions, and then we study the ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}$ and ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{+}$ propagators within the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model, performing a numerical analysis of the $B$ dependence of meson lowest energy states. For both ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}$ and ${\ensuremath{\rho}}^{+}$ mesons, we compare the numerical results arising from the full calculation---in which SPs are included in the propagators, and meson wave function …

Card 3 · Vector meson masses from a hidden local symmetry in a constant magnetic field

We discuss the magnetic responses of vector meson masses based on the hidden local symmetry (HLS) model in a constant magnetic field, described by the lightest two-flavor system including the pion, rho and omega mesons in the spectrum. The effective masses influenced under the magnetic field are eva…

Read full passage excerpt

We discuss the magnetic responses of vector meson masses based on the hidden local symmetry (HLS) model in a constant magnetic field, described by the lightest two-flavor system including the pion, rho and omega mesons in the spectrum. The effective masses influenced under the magnetic field are evaluated according to the derivative or chiral expansion established in the HLS model. At the leading order $\mathcal{O}({p}^{2})$, the g factor of the charged rho meson is fixed to be 2, implying that the rho meson at this order is treated just like a pointlike spin-1 particle. Beyond the leading order, one finds anomalous magnetic interactions of the charged rho meson, involving the anomalous magnetic moment, which give corrections to the effective mass. It is then suggested that up to $\mathcal{O}({p}^{4})$ the charged rho meson tends to become massless. Of interest is that nontrivial magnetic dependence of neutral mesons emerges to give rise to the significant mixing among neutral mesons. …

Card 4 · Heavy quark potential and LQCD based quark condensate at finite magnetic field

Abstract In the present work, we have studied heavy quarkonia potential in hot and magnetized quark gluon plasma. Inverse magnetic catalysis (IMC) effect is incorporated within the system through the magnetic field modified Debye mass by modifying the effective quark masses. We have obtained the rea…

Read full passage excerpt

Abstract In the present work, we have studied heavy quarkonia potential in hot and magnetized quark gluon plasma. Inverse magnetic catalysis (IMC) effect is incorporated within the system through the magnetic field modified Debye mass by modifying the effective quark masses. We have obtained the real and imaginary part of the heavy quark potential in this new scenario. After the evaluation of the binding energy and the decay width we comment about the dissociation temperatures of the heavy quarkonia in presence of magnetic field.

Card 5 · Magnetic polarizability of pion

We explore the energy dependence of π mesons off the background Abelian magnetic field on the base of quenched SU(3) lattice gauge theory and calculate the magnetic dipole polarizability of charged and neutral pions for various lattice volumes and lattice spacings. The contribution of the magnetic h…

Read full passage excerpt

We explore the energy dependence of π mesons off the background Abelian magnetic field on the base of quenched SU(3) lattice gauge theory and calculate the magnetic dipole polarizability of charged and neutral pions for various lattice volumes and lattice spacings. The contribution of the magnetic hyperpolarizability to the neutral pion energy has been also found.

Model-reported card use

Card 1 · fact

Affected output: the two-flavor NJL model with a magnetic-field-dependent coupling constant fitted to LQCD pion masses likewise produces nonmonotonic pseudo-critical temperatures, but cannot simultaneously reproduce the chiral restoration temperature and the light meson mass spectra

Model explanation: This row supplied the specific limitation that a magnetic-field-dependent NJL coupling cannot jointly reproduce the chiral restoration temperature and light meson mass spectra, which the summary now reports.

Card 2 · scope

Affected output: the magnetized NJL model with Schwinger phases included yields a charged pion energy that grows monotonically with the magnetic field

Model explanation: This row clarified that the Schwinger-phase treatment distinguishes the full calculation from plane-wave schemes, which fixed the scope of the summary's first clause.

No Evidence

Same model and position · no retrieved passages · first output

Preferred by blind review

No continuation text was produced.

Model action：complete

Earlier card-use comparison

The earlier diagnostic compared only cases with reported card use and text on both sides; its scope differs from the overall AI review above.

The with-card arm produced text and reported card use, but the no-card arm produced no text. This counts as reported use, without entering the two-text preference comparison.

The passages are input material; their presence does not mean an output used them or that they support every claim. Draft and source passages are excerpted; no simulated scores or PDF appear here.