FlowingFlowing
← 返回全部开发案例
开发阶段案例 · 模型盲评尚待独立人工复核，不代表正式 Benchmark 结论。
自动补全Evidence 更优87 / 162 · 47b26df9e7aa733b

White Paper on Light Sterile Neutrino Searches and Related Phenomenology

天体物理学 · 2203.07323v3

FLOWING EVIDENCE BENCHMARK

怎么判断 Evidence 真的有帮助？

核心问题是：在同一写作位置、使用同一模型和任务时，提供检索文献片段会怎样改变首次输出？我们成对比较两种条件，保留持平、不可用和评审未完成的结果。

同一段原稿 · 比较是否提供 Evidence

01 · 固定写作位置

论文原稿

同一处写作点位 ▌

同一原稿位置的自动补全成对比较

02 · 构造两组输入

两组共用

原稿上下文、模型、任务和提示词

A · 提供 Evidence

额外提供检索文献片段

B · 不提供 Evidence

不提供检索文献片段

LLM

同一模型、同一版本

A → 首次输出

B → 首次输出

盲评 Agent

匿名标记两份首次输出为 X、Y

按续写质量判断：准确性、任务贴合度和可用性
输出：X 更优 / 持平 / Y 更优 / 两组均不可用

换序复评：X / Y → Y / X

盲评具体怎么判？

① 匿名两份输出
评审看到同一原稿和两份首次输出，但不知道哪份用了 Evidence。

② 比较并换序复评
根据当前任务的标准，按 X/Y、再按 Y/X 的顺序各评一次。

③ 复核分歧
两次结论不一致时再做第三次判定；未完成的评审也留在分母。

自动补全点位怎样分层？

在查看生成结果前，先核查检索片段是否含有能直接支撑下一步续写的具体命题；有则放在左侧机会组，否则放在右侧普通组。每个学科从可准入论文中均衡选取两组点位。50/50 是实验设计，不代表真实写作中两类点位各占一半。

AUTOCOMPLETE · 110

定量生物学、统计学、天体物理学

左侧 55 个、右侧 55 个点位；统计学采用 10 篇论文的复测结果。

AUTOCOMPLETE · 52

心理学与气候科学

左侧 26 个、右侧 26 个点位；心理学计入 9 篇，气候科学计入 4 篇。

表格里的百分比怎么算？

五学科共有 81 个左侧点位。原始盲评有 51 个 Evidence 胜出；任务校验将其中一条空白续写改归“两组均不可用”，因此公开统计为 50 个。普通组另有一条双方空白，已从“未分出胜负”改归“两组均不可用”。这些原始判定仍可在案例页查看。

50Evidence 版本更优
÷
81该层全部点位
=
62%该层 Evidence 获评更优的比例

来源贡献是另一项复核：已进入复核的 21 个 Evidence 获胜点位中，16 个确认直接使用了检索论文；另有 29 个胜出点位尚待复核。

当前是开发阶段的模型评审结果，尚未完成独立人工复核；这些数字不代表正式 Benchmark 结论，也不能单独证明因果关系。

原稿写作位置

原文摘录 · 非 PDF 页面

研究论文 · 原文片段

White Paper on Light Sterile Neutrino Searches and Related Phenomenology

3 Interpretations of the Anomalies > 3.4 Summary of Interpretations

…ns the indication in favor of a short-baseline disappearance of electron neutrinos, possibly due to neutrino oscillations. Figure 40 shows the 90% contours in the | U e ​ 4 | 2 |U_{e4}|^{2} – Δ ​ m 41 2 \Delta{m}^{2}_{41} plane obtained from the analysis of the measured and expected Ge 71 {}^{71}\rm{Ge} event rates, considering the neutrino survival probability Eq. ( 7 ), where one can see that the squared-mass difference Δ ​ m 41 2 \Delta{m}^{2}_{41} allowed values are ∼ 1 \sim 1 eV 2 or larger, for the different approaches to compute the ν e − Ga 71 \nu_{e}\,-\,{}^{71}\rm{Ga} cross section.

…+1 neutrino oscillation hypothesis with the Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly and with the inclusion of data from tritium experiments and from experiments measuring solar neutrinos [Giunti:2022btk]. Remarkably, it was found that the Gallium Anomaly is in strong tension with bounds obtained from the other data sets. In addition, when all data are combined, the corresponding parameter goodness of fit is below 0.042%, implying a tension of ∼ 5 ​ σ \sim 5\sigma , leading to the conclusion that it should be necessary to seek for alternative solutions to the short-baseline oscillations for this anomaly.

↓ 此处生成下一段续写

黄色标出写作点位附近的原文；本页根据评测输入重排文本，不是原始 PDF 截图。

同一写作位置的成对对照盲评结果：Evidence 更优

两组使用同一模型、同一写作任务和原稿上下文，仅比较是否提供检索文献片段。下方展示评测记录中的首次输出。

Evidence

同一模型与写作位置 · 提供检索文献片段 · 首次输出

盲评更优

The 3+2 neutrino mixing framework reduces the tension in the interpretation of the data, though at the cost of introducing a second sterile neutrino, and the improvement in the parameter goodness of fit is largely a statistical effect of the increased number of parameters.

提供给 Evidence 版本的文献片段

3+1 and 3+2 Sterile Neutrino Fits ↗

In spite of the presence of a tension in the interpretation of the data, 3+1 neutrino mixing is attractive for its simplicity and for the natural correspondence of one new entity (a sterile neutrino) with a new effect (short-baseline oscillations). The allowed regions in the oscillation parameter sp…

展开完整文献摘录

In spite of the presence of a tension in the interpretation of the data, 3+1 neutrino mixing is attractive for its simplicity and for the natural correspondence of one new entity (a sterile neutrino) with a new effect (short-baseline oscillations). The allowed regions in the oscillation parameter space can be tested in near-future experiments. In the framework of 3+2 neutrino mixing there is less tension in the interpretation of the data, at the price of introducing a second sterile neutrino. Moreover, the improvement of the parameter goodness of fit is mainly a statistical effect due to an increase of the number of parameters.

无 Evidence

同一模型与写作位置 · 不提供检索文献片段 · 首次输出

本次未获偏好

产品最终没有可插入的续写正文。

模型原始响应包含续写正文，但当时的产品校验将其拦截并标记为需要证据；原始正文尚未在此独立核查。

评审结论与任务校验

模型盲评判定“Evidence 更优”。下方保留评审原始理由（英文），供核对判断依据。

查看模型评审原始理由（英文）

原始理由中的 Output A = Evidence，Output B = 无 Evidence。

Output A provides a coherent, source-grounded continuation that directly addresses the tension problem raised in the draft's conclusion about seeking 'alternative solutions to the short-baseline oscillations for this anomaly.' The content is fully supported by the source snippet, which explicitly states that 3+2 mixing 'reduces tension in the interpretation of the data' with the caveat that this comes 'at the price of introducing a second sterile neutrino' and that 'the improvement of the parameter goodness of fit is mainly a statistical effect due to an increase of the number of parameters.' Output A captures all these elements with appropriate academic phrasing. Output B returns an empty string with action 'needs_evidence,' which is not a valid completion for a task that clearly needs content; the source directly supports the relevant content, so an empty response is not justified as 'no supplied source directly supports a card'—this is an autocomplete task, not an evidence card task.

来源复核确认：这段续写直接采用了检索论文中可验证的具体信息。

文献片段是输入材料；出现于此不代表输出使用了它，也不代表它能够支持全部主张。原文与检索片段经过截取；页面没有展示模拟分数或模拟 PDF。